2012年8月28日星期二
A problem highlighted by Valentine is noticeable here.
With the increasing popularity of online education, due to advancing technologies and an
increase in funding for universities to offer distance learning, the role of the teacher, instructor,
or lecturer in modern higher education is certainly changing. But with a greater input of
technology upon a students education, is the competency and overall quality of the teacher
becoming less important?
In his essay, Distance Learning: Promises, Problems, and Possibilities (2002), Doug Valentine
describes, instructors and their attitudes towards teaching in a distance-learning environment
as a major potential roadblock to effective distance education, because, the instructor can set
the tone for learning in the educational environment. In response to this, it therefore seems of
great importance, aside from having the knowledge to utilize the technology for the delivery of
education, that he/she must also be eager and confident by his new means for teaching.
Following this idea, The University of Florida also published a paper entitled A Teachers Guide
To Distance Learning (1995). This essay calls for distance learning technology to be as
invisible as possible, endorsing the notion that it is simply a means or tool on offer to aid the
delivery of education.
A problem highlighted by Valentine is noticeable here. There are two differing opinions as to
what is the exact purpose of distance learning. The first, as stated by Schlosser and Anderson
in 1994, is to offer an experience as much like that of traditional, face-to-face instruction as
possible. Whilst the second opinion, that of Bates (1995), is that it should be used to improve
instruction. Depending on which of the above is to be adopted by the institution, it seems that
the quality, competency, and connection between teacher and student should be of the utmost
importance for the former. However, if a better education system is required than that of the
traditional form, then the position and actions of the instructor may be quite different.
For a distance learning course to be more successful than a traditional learning programme, it
seems that the role of the teacher should be more in line with the instruction of The University
of Florida. For example, the UoF highlights four adaptations, the first is to establish effective
strategies for implementing small group activities and individual practice. The second is to
hone techniques for maximizing teacher/student and student/student interactions. The third
is to establish successful approaches for integrating technology into the teaching/learning
process. And the final method for adaptation is to implement tactics for motivating students at
a distance.
The role of the distance learning instructor is no doubt changing in comparison to that of the
traditional lecturer. However, where an institution is seen to be implementing the most radical
changes and newest technologies, todays distance learning instructor has as much
accountability to his students, and a further responsibility to the future advancement of
education in general.
订阅:
博文评论 (Atom)
没有评论:
发表评论